|
After the film showing at the Empire Leicester Square, there was a party at Lincoln’s Inn Hall. The Hall doubled for Creighton-Ward Manor and inside (almost) everything was pink! From the food to the manicures and feather-boas on offer. Outside you could ‘pose’ alongside FAB 1, have a ‘flight’ in the space simulator, or indulge in some Thunderbird-themed games. Fun for young and old alike!
Birmingham Charity Premiere
In aid of the Baby Lifeline Charity
Wonderful cause and there was a very friendly, family atmosphere. I also got a chance to talk to the children who attended the premiere to get their unbiased and non-political view of the film. They obviously enjoyed the whole event and were very keen to tell me of their favourite parts of the movie. The children ranged from 7-13 and they definitely voted it a hit. They especially liked The Hood as the baddie, and the Parker fight scenes. I doubt if they will be concerned with what the critics have to say!
Good to meet with the Fanderson members who attended, although their verdict was that “the jury is out” on their opinion of the film. Perhaps they feel they are being disloyal to the cause if their comments are favourable. But folks, you are allowed to like both the puppet and live action version!
The Critics
The original puppet series was criticised by the heads of the TV in the ’60’s for being too Americanised. The two films, THUNDERBIRDS ARE GO! and THUNDERBIRD SIX were sniffily dismissed by the critics as being too like the TV series and the ‘fans’ stayed away in droves!
When we made UFO, SPACE 1999 and DOPPELGANGER, with ‘real life’ actors we were once again dismissed as casting actors who were “wooden!” So you see folks, you can’t win!
Bear in mind that the children who are the heartbeat of Thunderbirds are the real audiences and I don’t quite see them pouring over the reviews before going to see the film! It’s all too easy for the critics to latch on to the hackneyed phrases like “no strings attached” and “FAB or FLOP.” Perhaps, they have not cottoned on to the fact that the film has not been made for them.
Having now seen the film three times, I’m even more convinced that it will be a great hit. I don’t have to analyse why I think it will be a hit, all I know is that I thoroughly enjoyed it. As did John Read, who you will know was the key member of our original team. Neither of us had an axe to grind and were NOT in the pay of Universal or Working Title. We were perfectly free to come to our own conclusions without any political agenda.
I’d like also to correct a misconception that this is a “Hollywood film.” True that Universal financed it but don’t let us forget that every other aspect of the production was home grown British talent (with the exception of the very talented trio of Alan, Tin Tin and Brains jnr). What seems to be forgotten is that the movie has given work to British technicians for several months and shot, in the main, in a British studio. So how can this be described as a “Hollywood movie”? We should be supporting people like Working Title who have consistently over the years produced quality films that actually make money. Perhaps people have forgotten that during the 60’s and 70’s the only reason that there was a British film industry was because of the input of American finance. Are we going to object to that?
Don’t forget, I look forward to your spontaneous reviews of the movie because, let’s face it, your opinion does count.
FAB!
Sylvia Anderson
Home Page - Main Page - Thunderbirds Main Page
|